Welcome to London Motorists Action Group

 
Search
  Create an account    

Main Menu
· Home
· About LMAG
· How to join
· Board Minutes
· Forum
· Download Documents
· Handling PCNs
· Handling Bailiffs
· Tell us your stories
· Media stories
· Press releases
· The Law

· Recommend us
· Web Links
· Feedback
· Your Account

Who's Online
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: m2kn
Overall: 1127

People Online:
Visitors: 11
Members: 0
Total: 11

Welcome to LMAG - London Motorists Action Group

LMAG aims to STOP the tax farming abuse by London Councils and Transport for London.

We aim to EMPOWER London motorists in their fight against parking enforcement.

WE NEED FUNDING

Please give £10 or £20 if you are an individual motorist and more if you are a Business.

Individual Donations
(Credit Card / PayPal account)
Click here to donate
Donations can also be made by cheque payable to "London Motorists Action Group" and sent direct to: National Westminster Bank, Victoria Business Centre, 1st Floor, 57 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HN. OR Via Electronic Transfer:- Account Name: LMAG Ltd, Account Number: 67074073, Sort Code: 51 50 14

Business Donations
(Please note donations from companies are tax deductible. Ask for a receipt)
Click here to donate

London Councils - CCTV Code of Practice for Operation of Enforcement Cameras (re
Since 1999 the London Boroughs and Transport for London have been using CCTV cameras to enforce traffic regulations. The introduction of enforcement of traffic regulations by CCTV cameras is one part of a wide-ranging programme of measures intended to improve the reliability and punctuality of public transport, reduce congestion and pollution. The intended aim of most traffic management measures, such as bus lanes and parking regulations is to give priority to certain groups of road users by excluding others during prescribed hours. The introduction of CCTV monitoring of traffic regulations is supposed to reduce the level of contraventions and so reduce delays on the highway network. A code of practice was produced in June 2001 in order to ensure that the use of CCTV for this purpose was consistent throughout London and in accordance with current best practice. Designed to ensure that issues such as privacy and integrity are properly respected and by setting a minimum standard, it is supposed to bolster public confidence in the system.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, February 25 @ 19:06:02 UTC (35 reads)
(Read More... | 1259 bytes more | Score: 0)

Civil Enforcement Officers Handbook (draft)
London Councils Transport and Environment Committee have issued a draft version of the long awaited update to the Parking Attendants handbook.

Designed to standardise enforcement across Londons 33 Boroughs it contains guidance which has general relevance in London. It describes contraventions, their codes, exemptions and details of information that should be recorded to prove that a contravention took place. All types of parking restriction that boroughs are likely to encounter are covered. It is pointed out, however, that there will be local variations in policy and these will be a matter for each borough.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, February 25 @ 18:35:56 UTC (34 reads)
(Read More... | 1268 bytes more | Score: 0)

FOI - Congestion Charge criteria for dealing with representations
Following protracted argument over whether or not to release this information Transport for London lost a review application to the Information Commissioner and were ordered to dislose the document.

Originally TFL refused to release the document arguing that the release would prejudice the exercise of TFL's functions and Freedom of Information Act exemptions under section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) and 31 (Law enforcement) were claimed.

The information commissioner agreed with TFL, but then the information tribunal overturned the information commissioner's decision and ordered the document be released.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, February 25 @ 11:42:30 UTC (33 reads)
(Read More... | 4954 bytes more | Score: 5)

PRESS RELEASE : Manifesto on the Reform of Parking and Traffic Enforcement
London Motorists Action Group and Drivers Alliance in association with The Motorists Legal Challenge Fund : Manifesto on the Reform of Parking and Traffic Enforcement

Foreword by Lord Lucas, Chairman of the London Motorists' Action Group

Parking enforcement is a highly emotive issue. Hardly a day goes by without a story in a newspaper somewhere detailing how an unfortunate motorist suffered injustice at the hands of a local authority, private parking contractor, or bailiff. Indeed, a few of those articles are the journalists' own first-hand accounts. The BBC regularly airs features on parking enforcement and by all accounts they generate a massive response from viewers, far in excess of any other topic.

Why should this be? It is hard to describe the feelings of outrage, unfairness and helplessness that descend like a 'red mist' on receipt of an unjust Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). Rational thought is difficult in this emotionally charged state. Many people feel "something should be done" and resolve to write to their MP or local councillor, but once the initial anger has subsided many just pay up and shut up.


Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, February 23 @ 15:01:14 UTC (186 reads)
(Read More... | 7900 bytes more | Score: 0)

Normal Service Will Resume Shortly

Posted by pulpsimon on Wednesday, February 03 @ 17:38:38 UTC (54 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)

Bailiffs chose not to pursue appeal of detailed assesment decision
The baillif company having been granted leave to appeal the decsion have decided not to pursue the application

The Judge had specified in granting permission to appeal "The bailiff was following the practice in force for 15 years. No one has challenged the right to charge for wheelclamping before.

My decision that they cannot do so (at least to the extent that they have charged until now) not only affects the London Borough of Camden but also every Borough with de-criminalised parking.

Accordingly, it has significant local and possible National implications and that is a compelling reason why an appeal should be heard"



Posted by pulpsimon on Wednesday, February 04 @ 00:37:28 UTC (625 reads)
(Read More... | 3408 bytes more | Score: 4)

Parliamentary Question on regulating Bailiffs in light of recent death
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in light of the death on 7 January of Mr Andy Miller, whether they will bring forward their draft bailiff regulations.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Bach): My Lords, the House will want to offer its condolences to Mr Miller’s family. My right honourable friend the Justice Secretary immediately ordered an urgent investigation into Mr Miller’s death. The Ministry of Justice has been working on the underlying draft regulations for the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Prior to implementation these far reaching reforms will require full public consultation and at least 12 months for careful preparation by the industry.

Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, February 03 @ 16:38:03 UTC (532 reads)
(Read More... | 6419 bytes more | Score: 0)

Westminster’s motorbike charges rake in 7 times cost of extra parking
Westminster City Council’s controversial motorbike charges have raked in £2,272,000 in extra income - over seven times more than the £302,000 cost of providing extra motorbike parking bays, according to the latest figures provided by the Council.

Labour Councillors say that now that the costs of providing the extra bays have been recouped from motorbike owners, the £150 a year/£1.50 a day parking tax should be scrapped. Labour say that the £150 a year charge for a permit is equivalent to a 22% Council Tax increase.

Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg, Leader of the Labour Group, said:

“The costs of providing the extra motorbike parking bays has been well and truly paid for by motorbike owners - seven times over. All the extra income is simply an extra Conservative tax on motorbike owners and is totally unjustified. There is a massive campaign against the Conservative motorbike tax from Westminster residents and from motorbike commuters into Westminster living right across London. This campaign is growing daily and it will not go away.”

Posted by pulpsimon on Wednesday, January 28 @ 22:52:37 UTC (671 reads)
(Read More... | 2278 bytes more | Score: 5)

Westminster CEOs - caught on camera faking evidence
CHEATING parking wardens have been caught on video in a corrupt scam—brazenly dishing out false tickets to INNOCENT motorists then shamelessly FAKING photos as back-up “proof”.

News of the World investigators filmed them last week ticketing a LEGALLY parked motor and FABRICATING the “evidence”.

You can see our footage by scrolling to the video player at the bottom of this page.

After being alerted to the scam by a reader, we parked our car on Thursday in a bay where the parking- warning sign is missing.

There is a thin 10ft- high black kerbside pole —but without the sign, wardens CANNOT legally issue tickets to any vehicle there.

Posted by pulpsimon on Wednesday, January 28 @ 18:30:56 UTC (632 reads)
(Read More... | 3574 bytes more | Score: 0)

Detailed assesment of Marstons Bailiff - National implications
In the Central London County Court - Case No 8CL51015 - Anthony Culligan (Claimant) v 1. Jason Simkin & 2. Marstons (Defendants).  Before District Judge Advent 9th & 24th September 2008

Mr Culligan challenged the bailiffs fees & charges imposed by Mr Simkin and Marstons when levying distress and seeking to remove Mr Culigans car for non-payment of a Penalty Charge Notice issued by the London Borough of Camden.

The Judgment goes a long way to clarify exactly what a Bailiff can charge for levying distress.  Bailiffs have  always  sought to charge for fixing an immobilisation device by clamping a vehicle, and an attendance to remove.  These charges in Anthony Culligan's case were £200 (£100 for the clamp and £100 for attendance to remove).  The Bailiffs have  argued that the Fee Regulations permit them to make a charge for levying distress (that is 28% on the first £200 demanded, and for removing goods, or attending to remove goods where no goods are removed, reasonable costs and charges).  Bailiffs have claimed that the costs of putting on a clamp, etc. are costs to be included in attending to remove where no goods are removed, if payment is made before the vehicle concerned is removed.



Posted by pulpsimon on Wednesday, January 28 @ 18:11:14 UTC (1493 reads)
(Read More... | 5250 bytes more | Score: 5)

Camden Parking Manager Exits over Errors of Judgement
THE Town Hall claimed a parking chief appointed to make Camden's flagging parking system fairer had made "errors of judgement".

In an unexpected move, John Meyer left the council service in the final working week before Christmas – just two months after a Camden New Journal investigation into the council's much-maligned warden service.

Mr Meyer had previously been expected to keep the post of interim parking manager until the summer at least.

But his contract has not been renewed and he cleared his desk on the Friday before the festive break. The Town Hall said there had been actions "not compatible with the public profile of the post".

Posted by pulpsimon on Friday, January 16 @ 19:39:12 UTC (767 reads)
(Read More... | 8811 bytes more | Score: 0)

Man dies during visit by bailiff
A 78-year-old man from Accrington collapsed and died from a heart attack after being taken to a cash machine by a bailiff to pay a £60 speeding fine.

Retired pub landlord Andy Miller had only been released from hospital a fortnight before following an earlier heart attack in October.

Mr Miller's family said they had told the Lancashire magistrates who ordered the bailiffs about his health problems.

Justice Minister Jack Straw has ordered an inquiry into Mr Miller's death.

Posted by pulpsimon on Friday, January 16 @ 19:27:40 UTC (494 reads)
(Read More... | 2754 bytes more | Score: 0)

House of Lords - Traffic Regulation Debate
To call attention to the practices of local authorities in setting parking and traffic regimes, in levying penalties for violations and in the enforcement of those penalties; and to move for papers.

Lord Lucas: My Lords, I must declare some interests. In the part of the motorist, I am a trustee of the Motorists Legal Challenge Fund and chairman of the London Motorists Action Group. As an impartial chairman, I chair the Enforcement Law Reform Group and, in the part of local authorities and the civil enforcement industry generally, I chair the Civil Enforcement Awards. So I have experience of looking at this matter from all sides.

This is a matter of great importance to us. Dealing with local authority parking regimes and their enforcement is one of the main ways in which citizens come up against local authorities and enforcement generally. Whether that is done in a way that makes us all happier and increases our sense of fairness and well-being or whether it is done unfairly, with an attitude to revenue that was shared by the Sheriff of Nottingham, matters a great deal to us.

The legislation was well intentioned when we passed it. Looking back at what we sought to achieve when we set up this regime, I believe that we were very much focused on the proper use of the streets, the fair apportionment of that benefit between the various users of the streets, and safety—those sort of attitudes. I do not think that money came into it, but money has come into it in a very big way over the past 20 years or so, to the point where it has come to dominate the thinking of many councils. The reason why it has come to be so prominent is that the Government over that time have failed to use their powers to curb the growth of that influence and to bring practice back to where it should have been.

In some parts of this country, there is, relatively speaking, no problem. Essex springs to mind—I wonder why—as does Manchester. There are some councils with seriously good practices, but there are many that do not have them. There is a basic principle here, set out in regulation, that the civil enforcement of parking and traffic regulations should not be run with a view to profit, but no mechanism was set up to enforce that rule and the Government have made no effort to enforce it. The result is that many councils have allowed their thinking to become dominated by money.

Posted by pulpsimon on Friday, January 16 @ 18:46:42 UTC (550 reads)
(Read More... | 67968 bytes more | Score: 0)

Mayor hoisted by own petard
Boris Johnson is not immune to the draconian measures ordinary Londoners are forced to suffer because of the capital's congestion charge. The London Mayor has confessed that he forgot to pay the £8 toll 48 hours after he drove to light the Hanukkah menorah at a ceremony in Trafalgar Square last month. As any commuter will tell you, such an oversight automatically results in a £60 fine."I was a victim of this wretched system only the other day... I was done by my own system," the Mayor told listeners to Vanessa Feltz's phone-in show on LBC Radio yesterday. "I forgot to pay and then 'bing!' I got the £60 fine which I have just coughed up." The revelation came as Johnson was making the case for a new account-based system, which would make it easier for Londoners to pay the charge."That would get away from the crazy system whereby you suddenly get clobbered by these fines," he explained.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, January 15 @ 17:44:15 UTC (539 reads)
(Read More... | 1184 bytes more | Score: 0)

PATAS move announced - newsletter and appeal statistics
A decision was made by the London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee on 7 February 2008 to relocate the Parking And Traffic Appeals Service away from New Zealand House rather than seek a new lease at that property.

The new location for the PATAS hearing centre was approved in principle by London Councils’ Transport and Environment Sub Committee on 11 September 2008 and will be at:

Angel Square
Upper Ground Floor
Block 2
London
EC1V INY

The move is likely to take place towards the end of January 2009 and we will be issuing a newsletter next month to provide more detailed information.
Where personal hearings have been scheduled to be heard at New Zealand House after the date of the move, we will notify all parties of the new date and time of the hearing in due course.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, January 15 @ 16:39:04 UTC (556 reads)
(Read More... | 1614 bytes more | Score: 4)

Transport for London took bailiff action on fines motorists had already paid
Transport for London pursued enforcement action against motorists who had already paid their penalties.

Bailiffs visited a motorist in the early hours of the morning and clamped his car in pursuit of a penalty, even though he produced evidence that he had already paid, finds Local Government Ombudsman, Tony Redmond. In his report, issued today (23 December 2008) he finds “serious deficiencies” by Transport for London’s officers and says “It is not acceptable that cheques were cashed by the Authority and then little effort was made to contact the drawer or attempt made to reconcile the payments with the relevant penalties.”

Three motorists each received – and paid – penalty charge notices (PCNs) from Transport for London for various motoring contraventions. Their payment cheques were cashed by Transport for London. But the Authority did not tie the payments up with the relevant PCNs and so continued enforcement action, even though the motorists contacted it on numerous occasions to explain that they had paid and that their cheques had been cashed.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, January 15 @ 16:15:19 UTC (541 reads)
(Read More... | 4153 bytes more | Score: 5)

Can I Get A Refund from Ealing Council?
reproduced from Money Box Junction

“The guilty catch themselves” (Anon)

As a result of sustained campaigning by Jim of Money Box Junction and the local press, Ealing Council has announced that it will be refunding some yellow box junction tickets that were incurred since 20th June 2008.

The significance of this date is that it is when Shaid Iqbal, Head of Highway Management and Ian Ransom of the Mouchel Group were informed in writing by the Department for Transport that they were not prepared to authorise the yellow box junctions that did not conform to the legislation, namely the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002.

The non-compliant locations are:

    * Avenue Road & High Street
    * Lower Boston Road & Uxbridge Road
    * South Road & Hamilton Road
    * South Road & Cambridge Road
    * South Road & St Joseph’s Drive
    * Broadway & The Mall


Posted by pulpsimon on Friday, November 28 @ 18:26:19 UTC (747 reads)
(Read More... | 6478 bytes more | Score: 5)

AppealNow - Westminster F3 CPZ Landmark Adjudication Victory
In a landmark case at the London Parking Adjudicator, Barrie Segal, the founder of AppealNow.com, got the Controlled Parking Zone for the central zone of London’s West End declared illegal.

Barrie represented transport company, Keystone Distribution UK Ltd in a case against Westminster Council where he claimed that the  Council’s massive F3 Controlled Parking Zone in the heart of the West End was illegal and that no parking tickets could be issued to motorists on single yellow lines in that zone.  Barrie’s argument was that Zone F3 did not have the correct signs at each vehicle entry point and therefore the zone was illegal.  After a site inspection the Parking Adjudicator agreed with Barrie.

The effect of the decision (Keystone Distribution UK Ltd –v - City of Westminster Case 2080274557), is that every single yellow line must have a time plate showing the parking restrictions along its length (The Department for Transport recommends every 30 metres).  As hardly any single yellow lines in the area have these individual signs no parking ticket can be issued to vehicles parked or waiting there.

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, November 10 @ 09:58:27 UTC (2268 reads)
(Read More... | 5417 bytes more | Score: 5)

Ealing Council to Remove 6 Unlawful Box Junctions
THE MOTORISTS LEGAL CHALLENGE FUND - Press Release 6th November 2008

On 4th November 2008 Ealing Council issued a press release (ref: ST 203) stating that it intends to remove 6 yellow box junctions in the Borough thereby ending four years of unlawful enforcement. This change has been brought about as a result of a sustained campaign by motorists and residents principally led by Jim Douglas, creator of the website Money Box Junction with assistance from with the local press.

Ealing’s press statement attempts to deflect blame for any mistakes away from the Council and onto the Department for Transport. However, that does not alter the fact that the ultimate responsibility lies with the Council’s Highways department to ensure that all lines and signs are legal. Freedom of Information requests have been lodged with the Council and the Department for Transport, so the truth of ‘who said what to whom’ will become clear in due course.

Traffic signs expert for the Motorists Legal Challenge Fund, Richard Bentley said “They ought to be able to get it right. It’s not rocket science. The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Descriptions is mainly pictorial and is very clear. After studying that, if you still are still not sure, then the Department for Transport produces the very helpful Traffic Signs Manual and loads of working drawings to ensure that Local Authorities deploy signs and lines that are lawful.”

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, November 06 @ 09:56:23 UTC (993 reads)
(Read More... | 7928 bytes more | Score: 5)

Islington residents gets the hump with the bump
Drivers in Islington, north London, have complained that their cars are being damaged because the speed bumps are too high.

A council spokesman acknowledged there were a few which which are "probably too high" and it would put them right.

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, October 30 @ 12:47:43 UTC (674 reads)
(Read More... | 2493 bytes more | Score: 0)

Harrow 3,400 CCTV PCNs cancelled
THOUSANDS of people will not have to pay parking fines due to flaws in the wording on tickets.

Harrow Council was forced to cancel around 3,400 unpaid penalties issued to people caught parking illegally on CCTV after it lost an appeal in September. The error, which is likely to cost around £95,000, crept in after changes to the format of tickets were introduced on April 1 and the now void fines were all between that date and October 13.

But the 9,380 people who paid their charge on time will get no money back because the authority’s legal advisors say coughing up is an admission of guilt.

Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, October 28 @ 20:42:05 UTC (742 reads)
(Read More... | 1936 bytes more | Score: 0)

PATAS annual report
Chief Adjudicator’s Foreword  I am pleased to present to the Committee this joint report of the Parking Adjudicators for the year 2007-2008.

The most important event this year, although it only occurred on 31 March 2008, the last day of the year covered by the report, was the introduction of parking enforcement under the Traffic Management Act 2004, replacing enforcement under the Road Traffic Act 1991. We deal in detail with this development below. Enforcement of other matters under the 2004 Act – bus lanes, moving violations and the London lorry ban – has not yet been introduced. Enforcement of those contraventions therefore continues under the existing legislation. This means we continue with several different regimes operating in parallel. This is less than satisfactory. It has never been clear to us why enforcement under the 2004 Act could not be introduced for all contraventions together. Until these other contraventions are enforced under that Act, a principle aim since the legislation was enacted four years ago, a single coherent enforcement regime, will not be achieved.

This year we received 64,072 appeals, the highest number ever. At present there is no sign of the increase abating.

Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, October 28 @ 20:35:45 UTC (635 reads)
(Read More... | 1571 bytes more | Score: 0)

Croydon orders CEOs to issue PCNs or face disciplinary
Croydon Council has ordered traffic wardens to hand out a minimum amount of parking tickets or face disciplinary warnings.

The council, which has in the past vehemently denied giving the attendants targets, has had its cover blown by furious employees who are unhappy with the "unfair" system.

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, October 27 @ 19:35:02 UTC (614 reads)
(Read More... | 7981 bytes more | Score: 0)

Barnet Bus Lane PCNs found unenforcable
Tens of thousands of motorists fined for driving in bus lanes could have their penalties overturned after a council oversight. Barnet issued 33,817 penalty charge notices which failed to use the correct wording - and one was quashed at appeal last week.

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, October 27 @ 19:25:56 UTC (869 reads)
(Read More... | 2579 bytes more | Score: 0)

London Cab Drivers Club support the Motorists Legal Challenge Fund
LCDC Chairman Grant Davis & Ranks Officer Paul White present a £500 cheque on behalf of the London Cab Drivers Club to the Motorists Legal Challenge Fund ( www.motoristslegalchallenge.co.uk ).

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=BwxNdDai_70   LCDC Chairman Grant Davis urges taxi drivers to support Neil Herrons Judicial Review via the Motorists Legal Challenge Fund

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, October 27 @ 19:03:26 UTC (740 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)

British Parking Association relaunches Bailiff Enforcement Agents Council propos
The British Parking Association (BPA) has set up a new Special Interest Group for Civil Enforcement, chaired by Philip Evans, and issued a revised Bailiffs and Enforcement Agency Council (BEAC) proposal.

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, October 27 @ 18:55:12 UTC (832 reads)
(Read More... | 10130 bytes more | Score: 0)

Security Industry Authority not to regulate Bailiffs
Following debate that the Security Industry Authority (SIA) was likely to be appointed by the Govt as a bailiff regulator, it has been confirmed by a Ministry of Justice official in the industry press that the SIA will not be undertaking complaint handling.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) will have to take on complaint handling for bailiffs, a senior official said yesterday.

Posted by pulpsimon on Monday, October 27 @ 17:13:33 UTC (741 reads)
(Read More... | 2128 bytes more | Score: 0)

Motorists Legal Challenge Fund
If someone told you it could cost up to £60,000 to challenge a £60 parking ticket, you’d most likely think they were joking. But if you really believe that your ticket is unlawful and the Council refuses to cancel it, then you lose at appeal, where can you go next?

The answer is, next stop the High Court. Unless you qualify for legal aid (and so few people do these days) you are looking at a five figure sum! Access to the legal system for the proverbial "man on the Clapham Omnibus" has become prohibitive.

This lack of "equality of arms" has meant that there are effectively no checks and balances on the parking industry, so they have been able to operate outside the law, with impunity, for many years now.

The massive public response to recent media stories about parking and traffic enforcement shows that motorists are fed up with being relentlessly exploited.

As there is no watchdog or Ombudsman looking after the motorists’ interests, it is down to some individual or group of individuals to take on the challenge.

Step forward Neil Herron, a man who is no stranger to controversy.

Over the years Neil has collected parking tickets in his home town of Sunderland and challenged their legality.

Despite overwhelming evidence of non-compliant parking bays from an expert witness, when the tickets went to appeal, the Adjudicator found in favour of Sunderland Council.

To cut a long story short, Neil has put his house on the line to hire a top flight legal team so that he can take the only route open to him, a Judicial Review in the High Court. Justice - but at what price? And who for? EVERY SINGLE MOTORIST.

It is open to speculation that the parking “Industry” thought it was safe and that nobody would have the guts (or resources) to mount serious legal challenge. They certainly have the money (mostly taken from us) to mount a defence. But why stop with one case?

It is in every motorist’s interest to support Neil’s efforts by contributing to a fighting fund that will create a truly level playing field in the future.

They have the money and we have the money – it’s all fair and square.


Motorists Legal Challenge Fund

Posted by pulpsimon on Thursday, September 25 @ 08:21:46 UTC (734 reads)
(Read More... | 3330 bytes more | Score: 0)

Lambeth - 50 Wardens quit as visa checks begin
Nearly 50 traffic wardens have left their jobs in one London borough after immigration checks were carried out.

NCP Services Ltd took over the contract for wardens in Lambeth in August and examined the backgrounds of 150 staff.

Forty-eight of these then "resigned or just didn't turn up for work", the company's spokesman, Tim Cowan, said.

Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, September 23 @ 10:30:47 UTC (766 reads)
(Read More... | 2531 bytes more | Score: 0)

Traffic signs in Britain - biggest review in 40 years launched by DfT
Transport Minister Rosie Winterton today called on motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, highway authorities and road organisations who are keen to have a say in how our streets will look in the future, to take part in the biggest review of British road signs for 40 years.

The review will ensure that traffic signs keep pace with the latest technology, help to cut congestion and emissions and keep traffic moving safely and efficiently without cluttering our streets.

The review's aims include:

* To consider new powers to reduce street clutter - and ensure out of date signs are removed;

* Look at using new traffic sign technologies that can provide new ways of managing traffic flow;

* Provide better road information - such as up-to-date travel news - to give motorists informed choices about their journeys;

* Demonstrate how effective signing can provide safer roads and reduce accidents;

* Improve road users' understanding of traffic signs and signals.


Posted by pulpsimon on Tuesday, September 23 @ 10:27:42 UTC (730 reads)
(Read More... | 3522 bytes more | Score: 0)

Old Articles
Tuesday, September 23
· Haringey - 'Illegal' parking signs may spark refund bonanza
· 'Select committee to inquire into taxes and charges on road users'
· Freight Transport Assoc reports members paying £600 Million in London park
Thursday, September 11
· Ealing Council and its unlawfully marked bays
· Westminster tickets only as last resort & bailiffs abolished...
Thursday, August 14
· London parking ticket & appeal statistics 2007 - 08
Thursday, July 31
· TfL refunds £20,000 of parking fines
· Haringey tickets Haringey MP Lynne Featherstone while legally parked
· Call for London tickets to be issued by central body
· Motoring groups demand CCTV common sense and flexibility
· TfL reviewing 'Confusing' road signs
Wednesday, July 30
· DfT proposes to amend TMA 2004 to remove need to sign double parking restriction
Tuesday, July 22
· London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2008
· New boss at TfL promises "We'll be fairer to drivers"
· PATAS newsletter - Summer 2008
· Mayor quashes £25 C-charge hike
· Local London news catch up
· CHALLENGING A COUNCIL’S ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Tuesday, July 15
· Website problems with posting news - investigations ongoing
Friday, June 20
· Islington - Nurse spends 6 months hunting missing car to be told Council scrappe
· Performing Traffic Wardens Beardyman & Klumsy Tung
Thursday, May 29
· BBC - Council motoring fines 'illegal'
· Islington date mistake could be a £1m parking blunder
Wednesday, May 21
· Parking charge system "close to theft" and 'medieval'
Monday, May 19
· Drakes bailiff Pt4 complaint court report from Bailiff Advice Online
Friday, May 16
· London Councils Blue Badge "companion badges" proposals
Thursday, May 08
· Road humps blow for Islington Council
Tuesday, May 06
· Mayor Boris Transport Manifesto - Getting Londoners Moving
· 1 in 3 drivers fined annually - raising £800 million
Wednesday, April 30
· RBKC joins itself to Porsche JR as interested party

Older Articles



[1] DISCLAIMER. PLEASE NOTE THAT LMAG LIMITED HAS NOT HAD THE RESOURCES TO HAVE THIS LEGALLY CHECKED AND SO ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ADVICE. WE HAVE, HOWEVER, ATTEMPTED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS ACCURATE.


WE DO NOT HANDLE INDIVIDUAL CASES - TRY:-


Parking Appeals will show you how to successfully appeal your Penalty Charge Notice.
Quote Promotional Code "LMAG" to qualify for discounts.

Bailiff Advice Online for Bailiffs



© LMAG 2005. Website: Whitecurve Ltd

Page Generation: 1.45 Seconds